The moral status of animals and the ethics of how we treat them seem to get personal very quickly these days. How we think about the animals we live alongside, becomes ever more intertwined; impacting our social experiences, what we eat and many other lifestyle choices. We are starting to think more deeply about these issues, which in turn can create contention, for example, the vegans who ride horses or the climate change activists who still eat beef.
I see discussions daily about whether people prefer human or non-human company, whether experience beats qualifications in the training sector, whether an ethological approach to our relationships with animals is better than a philosophical one. Humans are great at creating argument and conflict that’s for sure.
What I only see rarely though is the viewpoint of the animal’s perspective. For example, what is it like for a dog to be approached by a human they are not familiar with? What’s it like for a horse to be caught and taken away from its familiar group of conspecifics, to be brushed, saddled, and ridden? How might the cat who is kept permanently indoors feel when they smell the fresh air wafting through an open window that they cannot get out of?
The vast majority of domestic companion animals are captive. That’s a fact. I’m not talking about being kept behind bars (although some may be), I’m talking about being reliant on humans for their food, exercise, shelter and so on - a state of dependency. So how do we manage to maintain dominance as we keep them captive, yet persuade ourselves that it is in their best interests?
Domestication of animals was always considered to be beneficial to them, a kind of reciprocity where we could use the animals as we see fit, in return for a life, food, shelter and health care. If we think about it, domestic animals would not exist if they didn’t serve some purpose to us, right? In terms of pet keeping, it is often the case that pet animals are well loved and cared for yet are still subjected to visual enhancements such as tail docking, or training methods that are outdated and cruel, to make them more acceptable to live with us. Unlike children who are nurtured through to independence, pets live in a liminal space where they remain vulnerable and reliant on us for their survival. Is that humane I wonder?
Domestication of animals was always considered to be beneficial to them, a kind of reciprocity where we could use the animals as we see fit, in return for a life, food, shelter and health care. If we think about it, domestic animals would not exist if they didn’t serve some purpose to us, right? In terms of pet keeping, it is often the case that pet animals are well loved and cared for yet are still subjected to visual enhancements such as tail docking, or training methods that are outdated and cruel, to make them more acceptable to live with us. Unlike children who are nurtured through to independence, pets live in a liminal space where they remain vulnerable and reliant on us for their survival. Is that humane I wonder?